Articles in Solar Energy
Ota City’s tiny Pal Town neighborhood, nestled among strawberry fields is one of Japan’s sunniest spots. This is one of the main reasons the rooftops of the houses here are shining with solar panels, making …
Heating water can be as much as 50% of a households energy use, so when a device comes along that can reduce that by up to 50% it’s an investment well worth making. And this …
First Solar, the leader in the thin-film solar industry, has invested in SolarCity, a residential and commercial solar installer in San Francisco. This could prove revolutionary for the solar energy market.
SolarCity will receive $25 million …
An MIT chemist has created catalysts that enable sunlight to turn water into hydrogen. If the process can be scaled up, it could make solar power a dominant source of energy.
“I’m going to show you …
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has opened Ausra’s first Concentrating Solar Thermal Power plant, a 5 MW plant at Kimberlina in central California (the first to open in 20 years). Ausra’s next plant will be a …
Scientists at the Ohio State Institute for Materials Research have just announced that they have developed a new hyper-efficient solar material that is able to capture light from every spectrum of the rainbow. Whereas most …
Mike has written a guide to building your own solar panel. Mike Davis, in his own words “likes to build things”. This post is but a very small summary of Mike’s page and his detailed …
While we spend a lot of time talking about traditional energy sources based on depleting resources that are extracted from the ground, I think its important to remember that the fastest growing sources of energy are solar and wind, and that these will never run out. As M King Hubbert put it regarding solar power in particular :
The biggest source of energy on this earth, now or ever, is solar. I used to think it was so diffuse as to be impractical. But I???ve changed my mind. It???s not impractical???This technology exists right now. So if we just convert the technology and research and facilities of the oil and gas industries, the chemical industry and the electrical power industry???we could do it tomorrow. All we???ve got to do is throw our weight into it.
Both Stuart Staniford’s recent “Powering Civilization to 2050” post and (to a lesser extent) Scientific American’s “Solar Grand Plan” concentrated on using photovoltaic solar cells to provide the bulk of our energy needs. While both thin film and traditional silicon based PV cells seem to set new efficiency records every couple of months (a CIGS cell recently reached 19.9% efficiency in lab tests, and multi-crystalline silicon PV cells recently reached 19.5% efficiency), the most promising mechanism for large scale solar power generation seems to be solar thermal power (often referred to as concentrating solar power, or CSP).
While this subject has been covered previously at TOD (from a slightly UK-centric viewpoint), I thought it was worth revisiting as solar thermal power has received a lot of press attention lately, as experience with generating power in this way grows and the potential becomes clearer to a larger number of parties.
Concentrated sunlight has been used to perform useful tasks for many centuries. A legend claims Archimedes used polished shields to concentrate sunlight on a Roman fleet to repel them from Syracuse in 212 BC. Leonardo Da Vinci considered using large scale solar concentrators to weld copper in the 15th century. Auguste Mouchout successfully powered a steam engine with sunlight in 1866 – the first known example of a concentrating solar-powered mechanical device.
Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) systems use lenses or mirrors combined with tracking systems to focus sunlight which is then used to generate electricity. The primary mechanisms for concentrating sunlight are the parabolic trough, the solar power tower (not to be confused with solar updraft towers) and the parabolic dish. The high temperatures produced by CSP systems can also be used to provide heat and steam for a variety of applications (cogeneration). CSP technologies require direct sunlight (insolation) to function and are of limited use in locations with significant cloud cover.
Solar thermal power plants have been in commercial use in southern California since 1985. An area of desert around 250 km by 250 km covered with CSP power generation could supply all the world’s current electricity demand.
Solar thermal plants can be built in their entirety within a few years – much faster than many conventional power projects. Solar thermal plants are built almost entirely with modular, commodity materials (and thus have short development and construction times) and do not encounter the sort of opposition on environmental grounds that traditional forms of power generation like coal and nuclear face.
Operational plants include :
* US (California) – 354 MW FPL’s Solar Energy Generating Systems (SEGS) plant, using parabolic troughs
* US (Arizona) – 1 MW Acciona Energy’s Saguaro Solar Generating Station using parabolic troughs
* Spain (Seville) – 11 MW Abengoa’s PS10 solar tower
* Australia (NSW) – 35 MW Liddell Power Station using fresnel reflectors
* US (Nevada) – 64 MW Acciona Energy’s Nevada Solar One plant (not to be confused with the Solar One / Solar Two experimental plants) using parabolic troughs
Plants currently under construction :
* Spain (Seville) – 20 MW Abengoa’s PS20 solar tower
* Spain (Seville) – 20 MW (each) Abengoa’s PS20 and AZ20 solar towers
* Spain (Seville) – 50 MW (each) Abengoa’s Solnova 1 and 3 using parabolic troughs (5 plants planned in all)
* Spain (Andalusia) – 17 MW Sener’s Solar Tres solar tower (molten salt energy storage)
* Spain (Andalusia) – 50 MW (each) Sener’s Andasol I, II and III plants (molten salt energy storage)
Solar Thermal Heating Up
There has been a spate of new announcements regarding solar thermal power over the past year – there are over 5,800 MW of solar thermal plants in the planning stages worldwide.
The company receiving the most attention seems to be Ausra, a company set up by Dr David Mills (who pioneered the CSP plant at the Liddell power plant in New South Wales using compact linear Fresnel-reflector technology) with backing from Vinod Khosla and Kleiner, Perkins, Caulfield & Byers (see here for a brief demo of how their technology works). Mills estimates that solar thermal plants could provide more than 90 percent of current U.S. power demand at prices competitive with coal and natural gas. “There’s almost no limit to how much you can put into the grid,” he says.
Mills presented a paper (pdf) at the IEA SolarPACES conference in Las Vegas recently which revealed some interesting statistics about the construction cost of solar-thermal technologies: US$3,000 per kW of capacity, estimating this will drop to US$1,500 per kW over the next “several” years. The New York Times last year quoted GE Energy executives estimating coal plant construction between US$2,000 and US$3,000 per kW. Ausra says it can generate electricity for 10 cents per kWh (close to the current cost using natural gas), and it expects the price to drop even further.
According to Technology Review:
What distinguishes Ausra’s design is its relative simplicity. In conventional solar-thermal plants such as Solel’s, a long trough of parabolic mirrors focuses sunlight on a tube filled with a heat-transfer fluid, often some sort of oil or brine. The fluid, in turn, produces steam to drive a turbine and produce electricity. Ausra’s solar collectors employ mass-produced and thus cheaper flat mirrors, and they focus light onto tubes filled with water, thus directly producing steam. Ausra’s collectors produce less power, but that power costs less to produce.
PG&E have also signed a 25-year deal with Ausra competitor Solel Solar Systems of Israel to buy power from a 553 MW solar thermal plant that Solel is developing in California’s Mojave Desert. FPL has also hired Solel to upgrade the SEGS solar-thermal plants it operates in the Mojave.
Another PG&E contract is with BrightSource to supply between 500 MW and 900 MW of power per year from solar tower plants in California, beginning in 2011, with the first of a number of 100 MW facilities being built in Ivanpah.
Algeria and Germany have signed a a joint research agreement for the development of a new generation of large-scale, low-cost solar thermal power plants (which could contribute to the Desert-TREC vision of large scale CSP in North Africa powering Europe).
More new plants are being planned in :
* Algeria – 20 MW Abengoa’s plant in Hassi-R’Mel
* Australia – 10 MW Queensland State Government facility in Cloncurry
* Australia – 154 MW Solar Systems and TRUEnergy’s plant in Mildura
* Egypt – 70 MW plant in Kuraymat
* Iran – 17 MW plant in Yazd
* Israel – 250 MW plant in Ashalim
* Morocco – 20 MW Abengoa’s plant in Ain-Ben-Mathar
* US (Arizona) – 280 MW Abengoa and Arizona Public Service’s plant in Gila Bend
* US (California) – 50 MW Inland Energy’s plant in Victorville
* US (California) – 250 MW FPL Energy’s Beacon Solar Energy Project
One of the key differentiating factors between solar thermal power and solar PV is that heat energy is more easily (and efficiently) stored than electricity, with solar thermal plants often combining energy storage into the design to enable around-the-clock, dispatchable electricity generation.
Most solar thermal plants are looking to use molten salt for storing energy – other alternatives being developed are graphite (in the Cloncurry development), heated water / steam (for the Ausra plants) and heat-transfer oil such as therminol (for the Abengoa plant in Arizona).
The existing plants prove that concentrated solar power is practical, but costs must decrease. Electricity from solar thermal plants currently costs between US$0.13 per kilowatt hour (kWh) and US$0.17 per kWh, depending on the location of the plant and the amount of sunshine it receives. Conventional power plants generate electricity for between US$0.05 and US$0.15 per kilowatt hour (not including any carbon taxes or cap and trade related costs) but in most places it’s below US$0.10 (wind power generally costs around US$0.08 per kWh).
An economic analysis released last month by Severin Borenstein (pdf), director of the University of California’s Energy Institute, notes that solar thermal power will become cost competitive with other forms of power generation decades before photovoltaics will, even if greenhouse-gas emissions are not taxed aggressively.
In 2006 a report by the Solar Task Force (pdf) of the Western Governors??? Association concluded that CSP could provide electricity at US$0.10 per kWh or less by 2015 if 4 GW of plants were constructed.
According to Bernhard Milow from the German Aerospace Center (DLR) electricity from solar thermal plants could cost as little as ???0.04 per kWh [US $0.06/kWh] by 2020, with well sited plants potentially generating power at lower prices than coal.
The US DOE began supporting large scale CSP last year, aiming to reduce the cost of CSP power to 7-10??/kWh by 2015 and 5-7??/kWh by 2020. The DOE estimated that reaching these cost targets could lead to installation of up to 35,000 MW of new generating capacity by 2030 in the US. James Fraser at The Energy Blog commented at the time that it was 5 years too late (given recent commercial activity in the area) and that PV solar may beat these price goals before solar thermal does, but that more solar options are good in any case, as both PV and thin film solar manufacturing will be constrained by availability for materials for some time as production continues to accelerate.
Another estimate from Sandia labs showed solar thermal costs (for solar towers) could fall to around 4 cents per kWh by 2030.
Another variant on the solar thermal power theme are Stirling engine based power plants, which generate electricity directly rather than first storing the energy as heat.
Stirling Energy Systems seems to be the leader in this field, with some reports talking about agreements with Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric for up to 1.75 GW of power. The company recently set a new world record of 31.25% for Solar-to-Grid conversion efficiency.
Passive Solar Thermal – Solar Hot Water And Others
Generating power isn’t the only way to utilise solar thermal energy of course – solar hot water is a very cheap and efficient way of replacing gas or electricity usage with solar energy. Solar hot water systems are in widespread use in Australia, with state and federal governments encouraging people to upgrade their home hot water systems to solar – almost cost free in some states. The New Zealand government is also encouraging the use of solar hot water systems.
An unusual variation of the direct capture of solar energy in the form of heat is from a Dutch company that has developed a “Road Energy System” that siphons heat from roads and parking lots to heat offices and homes.
And one final use of solar thermal power – it can keep your house warm, if your windows face the right way, and even better, have insulating glass that doesn’t let the heat out again – which could help make your building energy positive.
New technology uses cheaper materials instead of expensive silicon crystals. These new solar cells are 1/1oth of the cost of traditional silicon cell based solar panels.
Thin Film manufacturing companies
In his second blog entry, Andris Piebalgs moves the focus to European energy security. A few choice excerpts for those who want to have a more spontaneous debate:
Europe is currently importing half of their energy needs, and according to most of the studies, our dependency may grow to 70%. We are running out of fossil fuels and our energy needs grow. This makes Europe terribly vulnerable. As Commissioner responsible for security of supply I often wondered, where are we going to get all that energy from? (my emphasis)
The EU is already a leader in renewable energy sources and we have taken a commitment to go further with a mandatory target of 20% of our final consumption by 2020……
Ambitious indeed, but I would like Europe to go far beyond this target and there are many reasons for that: climate change, competitiveness, development of new technologies, new companies, new jobs you name it. And if this was not enough, we simply have to think that every wind mill, every solar panel, every litre of biofuel makes the EU simply more independent.
And on the recent spat between Russia and Ukraine on gas supplies (discussed by Jerome here):
A first agreement was reached on the phone by Gazprom and Naftogaz Ukrainy chairmen, and normal deliveries of gas have been resumed. I must say that the fact that supplies to Europe remained unaltered during the bilateral conflict between Russia and Ukraine plays in favour of their reputation as reliable supply and transit country. But I am still concerned. What would it happen if the bilateral crisis had become worse? Will this happen again? What about if a key supply infrastructure is destroyed by an accident or a terrorist attack? What would be the consequences for Europe of geopolitical instability in key energy regions like the Gulf?
I have to say I am warming to Mr Piebalgs appreciation of the precarious state of European energy security and the proposed expansion of renewables targets will receive my full support – with one glaring exception.
One omission from the whole strategy is energy efficiency. This I believe must lie at the heart of everything we do.